Dream

So if you are sceptical of this idea I warned you away from reading this because. You should base your opinion's off of sound logic and evidence not faith in me.

The thing is. The idea that our reality is a product of our mind is not just a theory.

I've done it.

I've deliberatly woken up from the first 26(ish) years of my life.

Using meditative techniques taught to me to help me wake up.

Taught to me by my teacher that has been teaching me for the last 17 years that the world is an illusion, that it is a dream, that belief creates reality.

At first I was skeptical. For many years but I tried it and it worked the way he said it would.

I've also done many other things that would be physically impossible in a materialistic physically objective external reality.

However the purpose of this article isn't bragging.

So I know from my own experience that this is in fact correct.

So this is what happened.

So me and my girlfriend at the time.

Got into a fight. Afterwards I was feeling really upset. I went to go and listen to Lazaris.

So I'm all feeling sorry for myself and blaming Gypsy.

Lazaris says "you create your reality, this is your creation but just because you created it a certain way doesn't mean you have to keep it that way. You can change this you could decide to just wake up from it. He told me to tell myself something It's been along time can't remember it exactly. It went something along the lines of. First taking responsability for the fact that the reality was my creation. Second ackowledging that this is a dream and I create it and I can create it different. Then choosing for it to be different."

I'm all thinking to myself. We'll technically according to all the stuff Lazaris has told me, ya it would have to be my creation. Sure feels like her fault though. (self pity, self pity) (pout pout)

But I was like well. This kinda sucks and it would be nice to have it different so lets try it and see if it works.

So I said what he told me to say and I woke up in a different reality.



So here's a couple additional points.

1. The reality I woke up from. Every single day, every minute and every second was accounted for going back as far as my memory can go. I was about 26(ish) at the time.

In the new reality. I had the same ancient past and my present was the same. Same family and house that kind of stuff. However yesterday was a blank.

( what if the world didn't exist 5 min ago.)

My mind didn't create a whole new timeline. Accounting for my entire life. It just glossed over the discrepancies.






(this implies solipsism discrepency between my reality and hers. if












If reality was solipsistic. I wouldn't tell you.

The way we create our reality is solipsistic in nature. However it is not solipsism because we are not the only ones who exist and we sync our realities up with each other. More or less.

Because of the solipsistic nature in which we create our realities you are the ultimate judge. Nothing can manifest in your reality that you didn't on some level allow.

So back to the single player vs multiplayer analogy. If solipsism is like playing single player. You are the only one.

The view I accept is like multiplayer. Now their are different ways that could play out.

Server based. Where their is a common server generating the experience and each player views the results.

(picture big server. lines out to each person.)

Or

Player based. Where each end user is generating their experience.


(picture each user has a computer generating a reality. lines between them)

Next point to a single person in the picture. By itself this is solipsism.

The reason it's not solipsism. Is because we voluntarily sync up our experiences with other people.

The reason why we do that. Is simple.

Solipsism sucks.

In solipsism their is no love. Their is no caring. You are all alone. You are all alone in a universe full of people because you are the only one.

If someone loves you, that is just a figment of your imagination that you are pretending loves you.

The only way someone can love you, the only way they can care about you is if you let them have impact in your reality.

(picture to computers, have love on the screen, arrow pointing between them.)

Materialism

Cold Dead Mass and the Chemical reactions it produces can explain everything.

You are just a piece of meat.

 Operating in a perfectly predictable machine like fashion. (mechanistic world view)

A meat robot. A cyborg.

Carrying out your genetic program. You are a DISEASE. You are a VIRUS infecting the world with your genetic material. Destroying your host with your toxic byproducts.

And rest assured.

YOU are INCAPABLE of love.

YOU are INCAPABLE of caring.

Your caring is nothing more than a chemical DECEPTION occurring within your MEAT. A chemical DECEPTION to enhance the survivability of genetically similar MEAT.

Love and caring are a chemical DELUSION.

You can NOT love. Real love and caring DON'T exist..

So NO ONE LOVES YOU!

NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOU EITHER.

In fact the ONLY reason you don't EAT your own kids and some animals do... and you are just an animal.

Is because you have inherited the genetic programming not to.

Where in chemical reaction does it matter how many people you kill? Which side of the equation do we put that on?

Kill People oops thats humanizing. My mistake. Here I can explain it SCIENTIFICALLY.

Terminating the biological function of meat.

Hail Dehumanization

Hail Racial Supremacy

Hail Survival of the Fitest

Hail Nihilism (from the Latin nihil, nothing) is a philosophical position which argues that existence is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value.

You find this morally objectionable? Whaaat?

Remember you are a ZOMBIE. 

You lack sentience.

What you perceive as sentience is actually chemical reactions. How chemical reactions manage to create the FAULTY perception we think of as sentience has yet to be answered by science.

You lack consciousness. You are a piece of animated MEAT. Animated by the chemical reactions occurring in your MEAT.

Since when has the life of a ZOMBIE mattered?

Their is no intrinsic value in ANIMATED MEAT. YOU don't matter. You live in a cold indifferent world. If you die it doesn't matter. Another peice of meat will take your place.

All your hopes, dreams and aspirations can be summed up in three words.

"PIECE OF MEAT"

As far as what you think. YOU don't think. YOUR thoughts belong to the meat. Their is no YOU.

If you think materialism provides a complete description of nature. 

Speak for yourself.

It might describe YOU but it doesn't describe ME.

If you really think that materialism is a complete description of nature.

You just failed the psychopath test.

#1. Lack of empathy. ✅
Remember love and caring are just chemicals.

#2. Inability to see the humanity in others. ✅
Remember no consciousness just chemically animated meat..

Matter is Solidified Thought

Monism means the universe is made of a single substance. Basically. So materialistic monism means that matter accounts for everything in existence. As opposed to say interactionist form of dualism. Dualism means their are 2 substances. Example mind and matter.

So materialistic monism says that mind is just a product of matter. Dualism would say that mind and matter are separate from each other. Interactionist means they interact with each other.

The way they view consciousness collapsing the wave function is an interactionist form of dualism. Mind and consciousness are separate and mind is interacting with matter. This will be explained more later.





Now I'm going to suggest something different. Conscious monism. That means that consciousness is the singular substance everything is made of.

Matter is solidified thought.

Matter can't account for consciousness. However consciousness can account for matter. For those of you who remember their dreams. Every night consciousness accounts for the substance of the world.

Let me give you an example. Imagine a dream. Imagine you are dreaming right now. Go look around touch the wall. What is this substance that the world is made of?

So lets apply it to the previous world views.

Materialist monoism: So this world is made of matter and the matter is giving rise to your consciousness. Okay it could works. On the surface but remember this was a dream. In the morning you are going to wake up. Now if the "quote" real world is materialistic monoism. Then the dream can't be. Simply because if it's the body in the real world that gives rise to your consciousness. Then a different body in the dream would give rise to a different consciousness and your consciousness would be tethered to the matter that gives rise to it.

So while you were dreaming *****applying materialistic monoism to the reality you experienced***** was false. Since the reality we experience. The "quote" real world is experiential then it may be erroneous to apply materialist monoism to it as well.

Interactionist form of dualism: So mind and matter are seperate. So your dream can be matter that big banged, abiogenesised and evolved itself into a seperate independently existing universe. With different rules, you know cause sometimes you can fly and stuff. So your consciousness is over there in that matter universe and when you wake up it returns to this matter universe.

Each of your dreams big bangs, abiogenesis and evolves it'self into a seperate physcially existing universe.

Interactionist for of dualism is only slightly better than materialist monoism.

Conscious Monoism: So if matter isn't a fundamental of nature just consciousness. Then what is this matter that your world is made of. So pick up an object hold it look at it. Stop and think about it. If this is a dream and the analogy that we are using is that you are currently dreaming. So what is that matter made of? Solidified thought.

Now lets bring it back to reality. You wake up. So what is your world under conscious monoism. The "quote" real world. It's still solidified thought. Consciousness is all there is. All you did is go from one form of dream to another.

Conscious Monoism: Matter is solidified thought.